This unexpected funding boost from the state is the perfect opportunity to make this project a true metro west transportation solution instead of a seasonal linear park.
The opportunity to create a circumferential transit service combined with a recreational / bike paths can truly occur for this irreplaceable corridor, and elsewhere in Massachusetts, if our Beacon Hill leaders honestly represent all users of transportation and are truly committed to a greener, more economically competitive Massachusetts economy.
The commuter-choked 128 and 495 Interstates clearly demonstrate there is demand for circumferential commuting – not everyone is working in Boston. It is long past time to connect our communities along this corridor with a walk-to-station, non-road based, all weather transit solution.
The state transportation planning agencies have not reexamined this project in any significant way since it was first proposed in 1987. Remember in that year we had gasoline at less than $1 a gallon in those years and significantly smaller population densities in the towns that this rail right of way passes through.
Repeated suggestions to create a Rail with Trail corridor to benefit a much broader user base have been inexplicably ignored by local and state planning representatives and agencies.
Shouldn’t a project of this magnitude benefit as many users as possible?
Wouldn’t expansion of practical, year-round commuting choices, that include recreational facilities, be good for the Massachusetts economy and its residents?
While part of this trail has been constructed, it is not too late to create a truly innovative mobility solution for all the communities this corridor passes through.
It was Governor Frank Sargent in 1972 who cancelled the I-695 loop project and the I-95 advance into Boston proper which proves that projects planned for 20 years can be changed for the better. (Imagine how much worse driving in Boston would be now if those highways had been built.)
This is where this trail is now. The project needs to be updated for today’s energy and transportation realities. The communities that Senator Eldridge represents deserve relief and practical choice from the auto-only commuting state we are currently in forthose not going to Boston every morning.
Please contact Senator Eldridge and urge him to support the use of these planning funds to create the “Bruce Freeman Transportation Corridor†that includes Transit as well as Trails.
2. Bob Krankewicz (07/21/2010)
Please support the use of planning funds to create the Bruce Freeman Transportation Corridor which would include Transit as well as Trails.
Leave a Reply
Blog Comment Policy
Your comments on this blog are welcome and encouraged. Please note that all comments are moderated. All points of view are welcome on Jamie’s Beacon Hill Blog. We strive for a civil discourse, however -- which means that while criticism is welcome, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory, contain personal attacks or obscenity, or are considered inappropriate, will not be approved. You are fully responsible for any content that you post.
1. An Acton Commuter (06/29/2010)
This unexpected funding boost from the state is the perfect opportunity to make this project a true metro west transportation solution instead of a seasonal linear park.
The opportunity to create a circumferential transit service combined with a recreational / bike paths can truly occur for this irreplaceable corridor, and elsewhere in Massachusetts, if our Beacon Hill leaders honestly represent all users of transportation and are truly committed to a greener, more economically competitive Massachusetts economy.
The commuter-choked 128 and 495 Interstates clearly demonstrate there is demand for circumferential commuting – not everyone is working in Boston. It is long past time to connect our communities along this corridor with a walk-to-station, non-road based, all weather transit solution.
The state transportation planning agencies have not reexamined this project in any significant way since it was first proposed in 1987. Remember in that year we had gasoline at less than $1 a gallon in those years and significantly smaller population densities in the towns that this rail right of way passes through.
Repeated suggestions to create a Rail with Trail corridor to benefit a much broader user base have been inexplicably ignored by local and state planning representatives and agencies.
Shouldn’t a project of this magnitude benefit as many users as possible?
Wouldn’t expansion of practical, year-round commuting choices, that include recreational facilities, be good for the Massachusetts economy and its residents?
While part of this trail has been constructed, it is not too late to create a truly innovative mobility solution for all the communities this corridor passes through.
It was Governor Frank Sargent in 1972 who cancelled the I-695 loop project and the I-95 advance into Boston proper which proves that projects planned for 20 years can be changed for the better. (Imagine how much worse driving in Boston would be now if those highways had been built.)
This is where this trail is now. The project needs to be updated for today’s energy and transportation realities. The communities that Senator Eldridge represents deserve relief and practical choice from the auto-only commuting state we are currently in forthose not going to Boston every morning.
Please contact Senator Eldridge and urge him to support the use of these planning funds to create the “Bruce Freeman Transportation Corridor†that includes Transit as well as Trails.
2. Bob Krankewicz (07/21/2010)
Please support the use of planning funds to create the Bruce Freeman Transportation Corridor which would include Transit as well as Trails.