Although I now reside in Ayer, ss the former Chairman of Westford’s Zoning Board of Appeals for many years, I strongly would support legislation that keeps Chapter 40B units within the program. Not only are these units needed for very real human needs, but they were granted under Comprehensive Permits having extremely generous density bonusses as an incentive to encourage their development. To have these properties leave the “affordable” market “punishes” communities that stepped up and gave up low density provisions that normally applied in their towns that were intended to protect their ground water supplies and insure balanced and manageable growth.
It is critical that they remain available to continuing streams of folks of moderate means as they attempt to step up to the American dream. They must not be lost to profit seekers.
Thank you for your consideration.
John Cadigan
[johncadigan@msn.com]
2. Jamie Eldridge (09/09/2009)
Dear John,
Thank you very much for your comment on my blog, and your support for affordable housing. I am a strong proponent of affordable housing, and served on the Acton Planning Board before being elected to the Legislature. I agree that Chapter 40B housing should remain affordable, and will be in touch with the Senate chair of Housing on that.
Leave a Reply
Blog Comment Policy
Your comments on this blog are welcome and encouraged. Please note that all comments are moderated. All points of view are welcome on Jamie’s Beacon Hill Blog. We strive for a civil discourse, however -- which means that while criticism is welcome, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory, contain personal attacks or obscenity, or are considered inappropriate, will not be approved. You are fully responsible for any content that you post.
1. John Cadigan (09/08/2009)
Although I now reside in Ayer, ss the former Chairman of Westford’s Zoning Board of Appeals for many years, I strongly would support legislation that keeps Chapter 40B units within the program. Not only are these units needed for very real human needs, but they were granted under Comprehensive Permits having extremely generous density bonusses as an incentive to encourage their development. To have these properties leave the “affordable” market “punishes” communities that stepped up and gave up low density provisions that normally applied in their towns that were intended to protect their ground water supplies and insure balanced and manageable growth.
It is critical that they remain available to continuing streams of folks of moderate means as they attempt to step up to the American dream. They must not be lost to profit seekers.
Thank you for your consideration.
John Cadigan
[johncadigan@msn.com]
2. Jamie Eldridge (09/09/2009)
Dear John,
Thank you very much for your comment on my blog, and your support for affordable housing. I am a strong proponent of affordable housing, and served on the Acton Planning Board before being elected to the Legislature. I agree that Chapter 40B housing should remain affordable, and will be in touch with the Senate chair of Housing on that.