There was reason to tweet “:-)” last week after House Speaker Robert DeLeo announced plans to overturn a rule blocking Twitter from State House computers. It’s easy to pooh-pooh the popular social medium; state Senator Robert Hedlund has called it a “distraction’’ that should be blocked, along with Bejeweled and Farmville. Yet unlike those online games, Twitter has productive uses. Web-savvy lawmakers, including Senators Katherine Clark and Jamie Eldridge, already use it to communicate with constituents (presumably via smartphones or home computers).
More Bay State lawmakers should draw inspiration from politicians using Twitter for constituents’ benefit. During heavy snow in Newark in December, Mayor Cory Booker used Twitter to locate residents trapped in their houses — and then shoveled them out himself. He has also used the service to admonish Snooki from “Jersey Shore’’ to stop texting while driving. (She had tweeted about being stuck in traffic.)
Meanwhile, Congress’s most famous tweeter, Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri, has posted updates on everything from how she will vote to where she would sit during the State of the Union. Representative John Culberson of Texas regularly answers questions on both Twitter and Facebook. This is cheaper and faster than the traditional constituent snail mail.
The State House ban grew out of fears of viruses and dovetailed with the perception that Twitter is a time-waster for state employees. But it and similar sites can help lawmakers to carry out their jobs with more transparency and efficiency. That certainly deserves more consideration than a dismissive “LOL.”